Business logic, APIs and distributed systems
Ruby on Rails, Go, Python, Elixir/OTP, background jobs, domain boundaries, permissions and production workflows that have to stay understandable.
- Rails
- Go
- Python
- Elixir/OTP
- Background jobs
Site search
Search services, domain expertise, technology and proof.
Technology
A stack that handles backend, frontend, mobile, APIs, data, infrastructure and safe changes after launch.
Technical signal
This is not a public API. It is a compact way to show how we think about technical work: name the boundaries, make dependencies visible and keep release ownership close to the build.
GET /technical-riskAccept: application/json200 OK{
"boundaries": "named early",
"dependencies": "visible",
"release_path": "operable",
"ownership": "senior"
}Example contract for positioning and A/B testing.
Capability map
Each layer names the pressure it tends to carry and the move that resolves it: workflow, UX, API contract, data model, queue, deploy path, infrastructure or AI pipeline.
Ruby on Rails, Go, Python, Elixir/OTP, background jobs, domain boundaries, permissions and production workflows that have to stay understandable.
JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Solid.js, SolidStart, Astro, mobile-facing flows, admin panels, forms, UX and design systems shaped around repeated work.
REST, OpenAPI, GraphQL, tRPC, JSON, webhooks, API clients, adapters, marketplace integrations and visible failure handling.
PostgreSQL, Redis, NoSQL shapes, Kafka-style event flows, ETL, reconciliation, background processing and data consistency.
Docker, Linux, NGINX, Puma, SSL, cloud infrastructure, bare-metal servers, deploy paths, monitoring and repeatable releases.
JSON-LD, Turtle, ontology-shaped content, search metadata, SEO surfaces, AI/ML/LLM pipelines, QA and agentic maintenance.
Business analysis, documentation, Scrum or Kanban collaboration, workflow mapping, acceptance paths and communication close to the code.
From layer to delivery
Technology choices only matter when they become a delivery sequence: map the workflow, validate the risky slice, ship in useful increments, document the decisions and keep production observable after release.
FAQ
Rails is mature and predictable where build speed matters without losing quality. We reach for newer tools where they actually solve the problem, not because they're trendy.
Yes. We start by reading the code and assessing risk, then propose modernization in steps - not a rewrite from scratch.
Yes, where it shortens repeatable work. Architecture, tests and review stay with the senior engineer.
Both. React, TypeScript and Solid.js on the frontend, plus mobile-facing flows when the project needs them.
Monitoring, tests, controlled deploys and clear data ownership are part of the build from day one, not an audit at the end.